Slowly learning how to study. Color coded my planner and plugged in all the assignment due dates for my classes. Figured out what I need to catch up on and am planning on reading the shit out of my German book wish me luck. 



I’m angry. 

I’m really just so fucking angry. 



anononthewater replied to your photo: “Update: I am wearing my SpongeBob pajama pants to class.”:
enjoy not having a boss while it lasts, a+ responsible hedonism there

Thank you! I thought so.



anononthewater:

not-the-very-button:

All I want in this world is an oversized t-shirt with the word “TRASH” on it and a pair of leggings without holes in them. 

WITHOUT holes

this reminds me of my favourite armless t-shirt, made in china for cheap and pretending to be a very old, very american t-shirt with holes and parts cut off, picture of an eagle included only 2x longer and 0.7x narrower. a wonder of design

that sounds like a fucking bomb ass t-shirt my friend



Update: I am wearing my SpongeBob pajama pants to class.

Update: I am wearing my SpongeBob pajama pants to class.



what if I wore my spongebob pajama pants to class?



ethankwolfe:

xthefaceofthefacelessx:

karin-420:

xthefaceofthefacelessx:

magnacarterholygrail:

so-treu:

LIKE SHE’S NOT EVEN BEING SUBTLE ABOUT THE SHIT

religion: nicki minaj destroying and being disgusted at phallic symbols

I actually feel sorry for Americas youth.  This is your role model.  My role model is my father.  And I can spell whole words too. 

image

broe you are 40 years old i’m pretty sure youve raised america’s youth

I haven’t. Because if I’d raised Americas youth, my daughters would value themselves more than using banana as a phallic symbol for being a dick in her mouth. And if my daughter liked a dick in her mouth, she wouldn’t advertise it to the world. A freak in the sheets but a lady in the streets.

I’m feeling second-hand embarrassment for a 36-year-old man what even is this.

THIS JUST IN. 36 YEAR OLD MAN FROM THE INTERNET BELIEVES FEMALE SEXUALITY IS SHAMEFUL AND SHOULD BE CONFINED TO THE BEDROOM.

NEW INFORMATION IS PRESENTING ITSELF AS THIS STORY UNFOLDS.

36 YEAR OLD MAN ADMITS ON BLOG (XTHEFACEOFTHEFACELESSX SUBTITLE: SEDUCING CORPSES) THAT HE FINDS NICKI MINAJ A POOR MODEL FOR YOUNG GIRLS BECAUSE SHE IS EXPRESSIVE OF HER SEXUALITY, DESPITE HER LONGSTANDING TRADITION OF ENCOURAGING WOMEN TO STAY IN SCHOOL, RAISE THEIR GRADES, AND REMAIN AMBITIOUS IN THE FACE OF PATRIARCHAL OPPRESSION. 

EXTRA, EXTRA! MAN WHO SEDUCES CORPSES ON THE INTERNET MISINTERPRETS NICKI MINAJ’S ANACONDA VIDEO. BELIEVES HER DEMONSTRATION OF A BANANA AS A PHALLIC OBJECT BEFORE SLICING IT IN TWO AND GRIMACING AT THE CAMERA IS AN INDICATION THAT SHE LIKES SUCKING COCK AND GIVES A FUCK WHAT MEN THINK OF HER OR HER SEXUALITY OR HER SOCIAL COMMENTARY.

CNN REPORTS THAT MAN SEDUCES CORPSES IN FRONT OF NICKI MINAJ. HAS NO CHILDREN.

(via natalie-portwoman)

#done 


incurablylazydevil:

piggyback-sexpot:

incurablylazydevil:

 I know what kind of man you are 

Okay seriously, I know what you’re trying to imply and you can just fucking stop right there.

"Oh he can identify different shades of purple and can dance really well HE MUST BE GAY." No. Be quiet. Sherlock Holmes is canonically an eccentric character with a brilliant mind and a lot of hobbies. He’s the kind of person that sees something and needs to know how it is done. 

Furthermore, you’re fucking implying that all gay men automatically know how to distinguish different shades of different colours, can dance etc. Spoiler alert: THIS IS A STEREOTYPE. FUCKING STOP.

He said girlfriends aren’t his area, he doesn’t like girls, it’s canon!” Someone doesn’t like girls so they automatically have to like guys?

"The whole waiting for marriage thing was just a facade because he didn’t want to have sex with a GIRL!" Yeah or maybe the whole waiting for marriage thing was just a facade because he doesn’t want to have sex at all. Sherlock Holmes (the original character written by sir Arthur Conan Doyle) is canonically asexual.

Seriously. Shut the fuck up with your Johnlock.

this is actually hilarious, notice how that gifset is just a collection of actual scenes and quotes from the show, without any mention of the word ‘gay’, and yet this person is THIS ANGRY and tells me to ‘shut the fuck up with my Johnlock’. How hard it must be for them to watch the show? Notice how they’re so angry at these tropes being used and yet they STILL recognize them as being queer subtext. amazing.

Listen, I think you can believe Sherlock is whatever sexuality you want. Straight, Gay, Bi, Ace, whatever. It’s all fine. I think there is subtext for a lot of those sexualities within the show and the original source material. 

But piggyback-sexpot is right to point out the stereotypes you’ve used to come to your conclusions. (Even though those conclusions themselves were subtextual in nature.)

Sherlock commenting on John’s appearance, likening John to the vitruvian man, his lack of interest in women and sex with women can absolutely be interpreted as subtext indicating that Sherlock is gay. The fact that Sherlock can differentiate “purple” and “lilac” or that he likes to dance can also be interpreted as subtext indicating that Sherlock is gay, sure — but doing so rewards reductive stereotypes that link typically considered “feminine” characteristics with homosexual men. It’s harmful to acknowledge those stereotypes. Doing so to further your interpretation of a character’s sexuality is disrespectful to the queer community and gay men who are frequently condensed into a series of such traits. It’s dehumanizing in the same way that assuming all lesbians have short hair, wear plaid, and want to be in your threesome is.

You are free to use the stereotypical to further your interpretation of a text, but it’s an unkind thing to do. Please, be aware of that. Be aware that when you play into stereotypes like the ones above you contribute to a system that degrades and reduces entire categories of human beings. 

Knowing a myriad of colors is not an indicator that a man is gay. 

Some gay men may know a myriad of colors.

Enjoying dancing is not an indicator that a man is gay. 

Some gay men may enjoy dancing.

They are not benchmarks. They are stereotypes perpetuated by a homophobic, queerphobic, and femmephobic society. It is possible for those stereotypes to exist in gay men, but using stereotypes as a litmus test is just plain shitty. 

I support people who want to ship Johnlock and interpret subtext as an indicator that Sherlock may be gay. 

I also support people who want to interpret subtext as an indicator that Sherlock may be ace. 

I also support that both kinds of interpretations, and in fact all interpretations, deserve equal respect and consideration.

I don’t support people who mistake in-text characteristics that have no connection to sexuality as indicators of sexuality because they subscribe to stereotypical representations of sexuality. 

And I know that you never directly stated that this series of gifs was intended to argue that Sherlock is gay. That said, your logic is flawed when you insist that recognizing stereotypes as subtextually queer proves that they are founded. Being able to recognize that traits are commonly believed to occur in a certain kind of person does not automatically grant them validity. Just because I can recognize that having short hair, wearing plaid, and forgoing make up all have the commonality of being stereotypically lesbian traits, does not mean they’re true. It simply means that I have been exposed to these stereotypes enough to recognize that they are, in fact, falsely attributed to lesbians. 

EDIT: I forgot to address the picture of Sherlock thrusting his ass into the air while drunk, but as this represents less of a direct stereotype and more of a tenuous connection between accidental anal sex positions and sexuality (and is likely a joke that makes little logical sex in regards to the actual interpretation of subtextual sexuality) I’m not even going to bother unpacking the eye-roll worthy reaction it elicits in me. 

(via earhat)



yourfaveisqueerasfuck



siennugh replied to your post: “I absolutely respect everyone’s right to call their romantic or sexual…”:
Most of the time, yeah its mega gross. But sometimes, I think the younger/smaller/subby person is referring to their partner as /A/ daddy, but not /THEIR/ daddy. Maybe? That makes me feel a little better about it, at least.

siennugh replied to your post: “I absolutely respect everyone’s right to call their romantic or sexual…”:
I know for a fact that in some Hispanic and Latin cultures, Mama (not Mamá), Mami, Mamasita, etc. is often used as a term of endearment for a girl child. Papi too, for boys, but less often. Some people do sexualize that IN CONTEXT by calling their…

siennugh replied to your post: “I absolutely respect everyone’s right to call their romantic or sexual…”:
…girlfriend Mami or whatever, but that can happen with literally any word. The same way white people say Sweetie, or whatever. It all depends on context. The term Baby can refer to a baby, a significant other, a pet, a car. It’s all context-based.

siennugh replied to your post: “I absolutely respect everyone’s right to call their romantic or sexual…”:
I mean, I respect/support your feelings of disgust and embarrassment, but also… I think you should account for context and colloquialisms. Words don’t always have to mean the same thing, I think.

You actually have a very good point about language which I hadn’t considered. And, though It still kind of squicks me out, I can agree that judgment should be context based. 



eziocauthon89:

safetytank:

i mISTOOK THE POLE CAP FOR PART OF ITS FACE


SO DID I

eziocauthon89:

safetytank:

i mISTOOK THE POLE CAP FOR PART OF ITS FACE

SO DID I

(via justabookwhorewithateafetish)

#same 


culvercreekprankmaster replied to your post: “I absolutely respect everyone’s right to call their romantic or sexual…”:
I dont think I have a full understanding of it but according to what I know it’s about age/maturity and not actually their fathers?

I mean, that’s definitely better, but I still don’t like it.



We can be uncomfortable together



And to be fair, I don’t really like the term “Baby” for romantic or sexual interactions either. It’s gross and reductive to me. 

"Babe" I’m okay with because it’s fairly outdated as a term for an infant these days. 



I absolutely respect everyone’s right to call their romantic or sexual partner by whatever they would like.

But for the love of god, I do not fucking understand the “Daddy” thing. 

Like, you realize that you’re implying you would like to fuck your father. This is what “Daddy” means. And, going off of the common trend of calling a dom or top “Daddy,” I think it’s gross and weird that people can so easily associate sexual dominance with their Dad. Like. Ew. Like super fucking ew. This is some Freudian bullshit and I don’t understand it. 

I don’t understand it with “Mommy” and “Momma” either, but I think that’s less common. 

Like it’s so fucking gross to me. If someone called me Momma or Mommy in bed I would fucking shove them onto the floor. Because ew ew ew no why are you bringing up parents right now? IT’S WEIRD. 

I get that humans and especially human psychology is weird as fuck, but I just. How is this such a common trend? Why is “Daddy” so fucking common???? It also literally infantilizes the other partner in the situation. And sometimes there is a weird child/parent dynamic that people play with when one calls the other Daddy? And when one partner calls the other one Daddy and the other one calls the other partner Baby? It gives this whole new gross connotation to the term Baby. And I just. That’s where I draw the line. Because any sexual kinks which sexualize children or childlike behavior, to me, contribute to societal beliefs that sexualizing children is okay. And it’s not. Girls especially are sexualized very young and it’s often heternormative for girls and for boys. 

So I guess sexualize your parents if you want. That’s fucked up and I don’t understand you, but you do you. 

Don’t go near sexualizing childhood though. I’ll kick your goddamn fatherfucking ass.